Wednesday, April 10, 2019

Generosity of More than Spirit

A Sermon by Reverend Debra McKnight
Preached at Urban Abbey on April 7, 2019

Scripture
Psalm One
Happy are those
who do not follow the advice of the wicked,
or take the path that sinners tread,
or sit in the seat of scoffers;
but their delight is in the law of Love,
and on God’s law they meditate day and night.
They are like trees
planted by streams of water,
which yield their fruit in due season,
and their leaves do not wither.
In all that they do, they give life.

Sermon
I love a topic most pastors hate, stewardship. I love it so much that I think the weekly report to the conference, called Vital Signs, should have a block for first time givers to be recorded and celebrated the same way we celebrate a new baptism. I say this because, I believe when folks make that choice, the hard choice of giving, it is a moment of ownership, commitment, and care. Folks are in, when they make a gift. It amazes me when you do.

I stand in awe of the practice and those who explore it, try it, and commit to it. It is, frankly, such a weird thing to do. There is little in the world around us that says giving your money away is a great idea. Our resources, most of the time feel like ours and we hold them tightly. We invest in them, we earn them, we save them, we spend them…sometimes we spend more than we have. Our money is something we keep private even though money, the way we spend it and the way we earn it, has an impact way beyond the private. We often look at what is before us and think of it as ours, created by our energy and efforts; but what is before us, if we are honest, is rarely just the fruit of our labor alone. Giving as a practice counters all of this, it says first, this is not mine alone and second, it looks at the web of connection by which we are woven and says, “let me invest in this thread. Let me strengthen this strand.” Giving is a radical act of connection. It is a work of caretaking and nurture and it’s not measured by the world’s measures of zeros and commas, it is measured by percentage and intention. I have been amazed by and surprised by it, there is no way to predict who will give what. I have watched folks driving a Lexus pledge the same yearly gift as a cognitively impaired adult who lives in a group home. In fact one of the largest gifts we ever received was from a near homeless woman, who put $20 in a giving envelope in our second year. I tired to give it back to her, my intentions were good and I was as nuanced as I could be, but she saw right through me. How dare I not honor her sharing. She was right, I had judged her the way the world would and decided she shouldn’t participate in nurturing the web of care that we weave in our giving. She knew more about giving and abundance than most people and was gracious enough to forgive and teach me. I have watched people grow into the practice of giving one step at a time and folks jump in…head first. It is strange practice that counters the norms of the world and I love the way it illuminates our values and forces to reconcile who we are with our own budgets and with our community budgets. Money reveals, even if we wish it to be hidden, our values and that’s probably why Jesus spent most of his time talking about money and countering the structures that kept some people poor and elevated the wealthy.

The early church shared everything in common. Jesus names, “Today salvation has come to this house,” when he encounters Zacchaeus and it has nothing to do with him saying a prayer and everything to do with Zacchaeus giving half of everything he owns away and then repatriating to the people he had wronged, with interest, in his work of collecting Roman taxes (Luke 19:1-10). Zacchaeus didn’t need that any more, salvation was about the now, his stuff didn’t define him, he was liberated and he was setting the structures right that kept others poor. Latter in the Gospel of Luke a rich young lawyer or ruler asks Jesus is he is all right, if he is in on the Kingdom of Heaven and then gives him his resume of not committing the big sins (Luke 18: 18-30, Matthew 19: 16-30 and Mark 10:17-31). Jesus tells the young lawyer or ruler to give everything he has away, but he can’t. In three Gospels, just so you don’t miss it, the rich young one can’t let go of everything he has and how it defines him. At least not in that moment and then Jesus names to the disciples watching closing just how challenging salvation really is. I am probably a lot like him, a recovering rich young person. Which is also why, I like to imagine a second half to the rich young man’s story that just didn’t make it in Luke or Acts.

I came to love the practice of stewardship early in my ministry, it wasn’t because I had taken a class on it. That class was offered at the same time as advanced feminist theory, and I wasn’t going to take a class on church administration. When I started seminary, it was as though I had no idea how churches were run or fueled. I didn’t think there was a magical money tree but I just never thought about it. I knew people gave and I didn’t think much about the logistics or the reasons behind any of it. I’m not really sure a class would have mattered to me even if I had taken it. I wasn’t ready to practice giving and sharing, it was never a strength as the oldest child and only girl in my family. Of course, I had watched my dad and mom practice generosity. They gave to the church, to the community, and to the school; they gave with both their time and their resources. They were generous to my friends and our family, they were generous with their support when people had questions or needed connection and they were generous in sharing their home. I knew what generosity was, but practicing it was something I was waiting to do.

I had classmates in seminary who gave to the church. I thought it was so strange, these graduate students with hardly any money, faithfully giving five or ten dollars a week. I thought, how could that matter? I never gave, I passed that basket right along, in two different churches. Giving was something grown ups with full time jobs did, like my Dad. Of course, I had time and money to shop like a grown-up and I went out to dinner with friends like a grown-up. I bought birthday gifts like a grown up and I purchased chai tea while I studied like a grownup. I went to movies and concerts like a grown-up. Perhaps I imagined generosity as something you do when you have so much money you can put your name on a building but am glad I grew up, at least a little.

I remember my first gift. It was to the Cathedral of Hope in Dallas where they were building an Interfaith Peace Chapel. They had a history of inclusion and set a vision for this beautiful, sacred space to share and I wanted to be a part of it. They were entering their 37th year of ministry and they asked folks to pledge $37, $370, $3,700 or $37,000 and I rolled that pledge card around my hands. I wanted to be a part of that building and that effort and so I pledged. Thirty seven dollars didn’t feel right, I had shoes that cost more than that. It didn’t mean that much and it wasn’t hard. At the same time $3,700 or $37,000 were totally out of reach, but $370 was a lot and it mattered and so I pledged it. I gave it. And that gift taught me to take a first step and it was good practice. Two years later, I was entering my first appointment as a Methodist pastor, and the bishop told me and all the new pastors, “I expect you to give, I expect you to tithe. I expect you to lead. You can’t invite people into something that you do not do.” It’s true, I have met my fair share of pastors who don’t give to their church. They have a number of reasons, like that they so undervalue their work that they in a sense give by not requiring a higher salary; but I think it’s probably because they don’t really want to take ownership in the ministry, like it’s everyone else responsibility or a nice spiritual practice…for others. Or maybe they also skipped the class in seminary for Advanced Feminist Theory and still imagined that a giant money tree was planned on site at every Methodist Church.

I set out to make my bishop proud. I made a big pledge, at least for me. I just didn’t make a plan on how to give any of it. I put it off, I didn’t break it down week by week or month by month. I spent plenty of money, just not so much on my church until at the end of the year I had to catch up. It was overwhelming and when I looked at what I had spent on just about everything else, most of which was not really necessary, I knew I needed to make a change. My budget didn’t say what I wanted it to say. To be honest it wasn’t so much of a budget as it was a rough estimation of having enough money to buy this or spend that. I had not put my money where my mouth was. I had become famous for my amazing shoes, not for my generous spirit. People were buying me little gifts and sending me cards all themed around cute shoes, particularly when they intersected with women’s empowerment. They were sweet and delightful but I didn’t want that to be my only story. I thought, if I died today people would say look at how much she loved shoes and there would literally be a mountain of evidence to back up that statement.

I began to love stewardship because of what it taught me, how I learned to share more and how I started giving more. I didn’t miss the money I had given way and I guess I didn’t miss the things I didn’t really need to buy either. More than that, I think it was an act of growing up, not just in relationship to my church but to my community. I could say, I want to be a part of this man’s election. I want to be a part of this woman’s campaign. I want to be a part of this event or cause of a non-profit and not in word only but in action and deed. I was learning more about the power of collective giving and how my gifts mattered, not only to me as a practice that could help me be more generous, but to the organizations I wanted to support and fuel and nurture. It changed not only my giving but my spending, what did I want to invest in? Did my dollar vote as local as possible or as fair as possible? I saved more as I gave more. I wanted to be a better steward in every way, or at least try.

Talking about money is never very easy. I was grateful that I began practicing generosity myself because I would need to start doing it more as the Abbey grew. When it comes to talking about money in church there can be two serious obstacles. The first, is that with everything powerful in the world, people find a way destroy something beautiful. We see this in scandal, when a pastor or a church treasurer embezzles money and we see it when a pastor misuses their power and asks sweet old ladies to send their social security dollars in so he can have another jet, or mansion, or whatever else obscenely rich folks buy. The second reason, is probably even more challenging, which is to say, that we don’t talk about money and when we do, we don’t always do it very well. Maybe a private conversation with a credit card company or a financial planner, but not really a public conversation. We can’t ask people what they make, we can’t talk about what they have, we can’t ask real questions because they are not polite and I think that is designed with intention. Because if we start talking, we start to know the pay inequalities all around us. We start to wonder, marvel, and become enraged at the financial inequalities that surround us. When we start asking these questions, we start to sound like the one that was crucified so long before us. We need to talk about money, budgets, and access to power, if we don’t the systems that exist now - always will.

I’m ever grateful I was learning about giving because when we began this effort, I had little idea how hard or how empowering stewardship would be. In fact when we started, I tried to lay all of the costs at the feet of the coffee bar. I knew giving was a spiritual practice, I knew it mattered, but I guess I still didn’t trust it. When I attended New Church Start Boot Camp, my peers were thinking of the people they could ask for major gifts to help fund the startup phase. I loved their care for the vision of creating community, but I thought to myself, wouldn’t it be nice if we were rolling in coffee money and I never really had to worry about doing that. I thought it was a no brainer; why wouldn’t people pick us over Starbucks, we give 10% of our sales away plus we are so friendly and we are going to try so hard. Well, it turns out there were a lot of reasons people didn’t pick us, and trying hard wasn’t enough to convince anyone to come drink our coffee everyday. We would not, as it would turn out, be rolling in coffee money. And I had to start talking about it.

I had not been very clear about money, in part because I didn’t know how to ask people to pledge to the Abbey while we were also a part of a larger church. This messiness came with the benefits of financial management and office support, but it also came with the confusion of who is paying for what ministry. Our budgets were separate but that’s not really what it looked like outside of the finance committees. So when our leaders talked about money, it was easier for everyone to think about how we could sell more stuff rather, than the real question of practicing faithful stewardship.

We had to grow into our work both as a church and as a coffee bar. The coffee bar lagged behind, even as our evening service began to fill up. In 2014, my spouse and accountant gave me a projection, he had been reviewing our profit and loss statements from the very start and his spreadsheets said we would close in 12 months (he does this work for a big company, so I had to take him seriously). We would run out of money and we would close - even with rather unrealistic improvements we would only limp by for 18 months. Some hard conversations and choices were at hand. I didn’t start this ministry with a heart for closing it, and at least if it did close, I wanted to say I had given it everything I could and I just didn’t feel like I could say that when I was still working with one foot in our mother church.

The end of 2014 and the beginning of 2015 was just about the most challenging time in my professional life and probably the most uncertain for the life of the Abbey. We were growing into our own church and leaving our mother church. I leaned into the first Psalm daily, the poetry of a tree rooted by the waters and the notion of it giving life in its due season. This just wasn’t spring yet. It’s just winter and I had to wait for the fruitful season to follow. In this time I even began to debate one of the most clear values we had held from the start. We give 10% of our coffee bar sales away, which is delightful and ridiculous when you are trying not to close in 12 months and can think of all kinds of ways that you could deploy that resource internally. One of my coaches suggested it, she named other ideas on how we support people and that if we go away, so do the ways we make sacred space for people and organizations in our city. I started to agree and brought it to a few board members to begin a discussion, it went nowhere. No one wanted to entertain it, giving was a part of our work. We kept giving as a community. We kept taking that collective risk. We continued to nurture those ties to nonprofits and we worked to build those relationships. If we were going to take the risk, we started investing more in the partnership, more time and energy, more preparation and more intention that this would be a true partnership, not an act of charity. This work transformed our space, we do nothing alone and the gatherings we hosted went from 50 some a year to more than 120 this past year. We gave our space, our time, and our resources with intention, just like we ask individuals to do, and we not only grew but we were able to keep generosity for others at the center of our focus.

I also started asking people for help fueling the Abbey. It was clear now that if you gave to the Abbey, it fueled the Abbey. It was clear now that that big church on the hill wasn’t paying for everything and if we wanted to exist, we had to take ownership. People started giving, and giving with intention. Every gift mattered, weekly gifts of $5 and $20 and $100. The first year, our giving doubled. The second year, our giving doubled again. And it is not because one person started giving a huge gift and we could put their name on the building, it is because 60 people and then 100 people and more started giving, as a practice. They nurtured the web of this community. They drew us together in relationship and for every gift I am truly grateful. We didn’t close in 12 months and we have ended every year in the black.

As we continued to grow, I had the opportunity to deploy the best practices of nonprofits around us. New church starts may lack the stability of an existing church (or at least the impression of it) but what we lack in stability, we more than make up for in flexibility. I could deploy best practices, like a narrative budget, online giving, thank you notes to first time givers and thank you notes on quarterly giving statements, and I didn’t have to organize five meetings with key stakeholders to do it. I didn’t have to to spend one moment winning over the church’s Chief Objection Officer or the Head Matriarch, because we didn’t have one. New churches, like new people, are often a little more flexible, it is the gift that balances inherent uncertainty and vulnerability. When money gets tight we often start nickeling and diming folks, in a church this looks like turning what could be a great community-building event into an opportunity to collect five dollars from folks who bring their kids to an egg hunt or stop by for a nice hot dinner. We’ve never had to do that, we thought about it, but we could double down on generosity and keep focused on our intention of being for others. We focused on our strengths as a church, our difference made us stronger. We could participate in community-giving events in a way that most traditional churches can’t or shouldn’t (in my opinion, at least not until they are known as a community asset) and that helps us remember to focus on being for others rather than being for ourselves. It is not hard to ask people to give when you know in your heart of hearts that this place and this work matters.

I had to deploy my own strengths, take what I had learned in all of the classes and embody these practices in a way that felt right in my own skin and with my own language. I asked for the offering with care and intention each week. We hosted classes around budgeting, not with the prosperity gospel but with a progressive, Methodist theological framework. I started to gather folks before large stewardship efforts to ask for early commitments, to share why this place mattered and to break bread. It had an astounding impact and the truth is all I had really done was connect people, give space for stories and invite people to be a part of it. I hadn’t even provided all of the content. Each person who shared was offering a new verse to the song of love we are singing together. People cried, people laughed, and in the end people knew each other better and I think that is why they gave. 

In our first year, there was one large gift from a Life Insurance Policy that slipped through our fingers because of a technical mistake, over which I had no control and had worked to prevent two years before. It was heartbreaking and frustrating. That $42,000 would have given me so much peace in our unsettled seasons when I worried and prayed, wondered and cried, yes cried…a lot… about our making it through the next 18 months. I am certain we would have put that gift to good use and deployed every penny in love. But I am sometimes grateful, because our path forward involved so many gifts that were given with great love and deep intention. Those gifts may be dwarfed by that one gift in the eyes of the world, but our course proved to be one of many people, practicing generosity together. At the time Bernie Sanders was running for president and proudly touted that his average campaign gift was $27. So was ours, so was ours. Our work is fueled by grad students giving five dollars a week and professionals giving $100. Folks giving quarterly, monthly, and annually at every increment. Folks took leaps from not giving to giving ten dollars, then taking another step to $15, and then the next year to $20 a week. Community folks giving through Omaha Gives and Giving Tuesday and church folks giving month by month, or week by week, fueled us forward. I couldn’t be more grateful for each one. Each one is a celebration of sharing the work, strengthening our connection and making a real, tangible commitment to journey together.

Our faith calls us to strengthen and nurture the ties between us, the relationships that weave us together. This work requires generosity, it is weird by the world’s standards. It is risky and liberating a the same time. It saves us from ourselves. May we have the courage! Amen

Reflection Questions
What is your experience with giving?
What makes it a hard practice?
What might be a next step for you?

Thursday, April 4, 2019

Invitation in a World of Domination: Feminist Emancipatory Evangelism

A Sermon by Reverend Debra McKnight
Preached at Urban Abbey on March 31, 2019

Scripture: John 1:38-42
When Jesus turned and saw them following, he said to them, ‘What are you looking for?’ They said to him, ‘Rabbi’ (which translated means Teacher), ‘where are you staying?’ 39He said to them, ‘Come and see.’ They came and saw where he was staying, and they remained with him that day. It was about four o’clock in the afternoon. 40One of the two who heard John speak and followed him was Andrew, Simon Peter’s brother. 41He first found his brother Simon and said to him, ‘We have found the Messiah’ (which is translated Anointed). 42He brought Simon to Jesus, who looked at him and said, ‘You are Simon son of John. You are to be called Cephas’ (which is translated Peter).

Sermon: Invitation in a World of Domination
This is a story of invitation. Andrew senses something working in this moment and rather than shy away, he not only joins in but also invites his brother. It is relational and connectional and born out of love for a larger purpose. Andrew invites Simon Peter to be a disciple and it is hard to imagine the Christian Story without him. Some folks might even call this a story of… umm… (whisper) evangelism. This can be a scary word for some of us, not because we find the vocabu-lary challenging but because we find evangelicals challenging. Some of us have had experiences that are not so lovely; experiences that were not born out of a sense of our worth but quite the opposite - experiences that were wounding. I come to this with awareness of how hard it can be for folks to hear the word and I come to this conversation with a need to repent, frankly. I have been a part of some evangelical groups in both high school and college and I have invited people and some of them are still there…not literally still hanging out with the Navigators in Lincoln on Friday nights, but theologically, I suspect they are. It was what you were taught to do, like evan-gelism is reaching the highest level of a video game. There was this intention that you invite people, and help them get the right words and the right answers and then they go invite other people, like an evangelical pyramid scheme grooming folks into just the right kind of disciples.

In the spirit of evangelism, folks commit all number of sins from yelling at students on college campus about going to hell or standing outside of Planned Parenthood yelling at women about going to hell or rejecting their gay children because they are going to hell… it’s a lot of hell and not a lot of “earth as it is in heaven.” The truth is, evangelism is not really about hell and it’s not really about making people fit our list of right behaviors or teaching them to answer questions with our ‘right’ answers. Evangelism can be and should be born out of love and a spirit of whole hearted risk taking, but this is lost when corrupted by a theology of original sin and a perspective that our terrible, gross souls need saving from some eternal, terrible hell fire - as if God cannot be at one with us any other way. And these theories can lead us down a path of wearing matching t-shirts, driving to some unsuspecting neighborhood and going door-to-door with pamphlets and asking people to recite this prayer, then come and change everything to be like us. Or at least come to our church and do all of the things we are doing. It’s a total makeover of someone’s life… like queer eye, only usually by folks who would not approve of that show… or if they did they wouldn’t tell anyone about it.

Evangelism that starts with how terrible we are rather than how sacred, worthy, valued and be-loved we are is not only dangerous, but also not Christian. Inviting people, including people, connecting with people and helping each other grow is the power of the Christian story, that’s the power of journey in the way of Jesus. But… almost as soon as Jesus wasn’t there to correct folks, historic Christians began linking arms with the empire and leaning into the old ways. Jesus said, “Go to the ends of the Earth,” get out of your little kingdoms and get out of your little tribes, go big with love and connection and then folks start taking that as an opportunity to dominate and destroy, to dismantle other cultures and name the sins of other people. Conversion becomes about compliance and control, spiritual practice becomes behavioral regulation and stories of liberation become tools of bondage. In the name of Jesus, Charlemagne beheads a whole community of people, 800+ men, women and children all because they won’t convert and be baptized into his brand of Christianity. Crusades bring violence in the name of Jesus and we still struggle to denounce them and to distance ourselves from such violent language. Today there is still an organization with this language, like Campus Crusade for Christ, and while they may not be sending an army of children across Europe (a low point in Christian history… in my opinion) they embody this theology of evangelism that is both toxic and destructive to the mind and soul… even if there is no physical harm in the process. We have a history of violence, physical and spiritual, all accomplished in the name of Jesus.

The thing is, this is not how Jesus invited or included anyone. There is no story where Jesus says, “Hey, confess me as your Lord of Savior” and he doesn’t even want Peter to draw a sword in his defense let alone tell people to join him for a crusade. Jesus never starts with how terrible some-one is (maybe sometimes how systems are terrible, but not people). To the people he starts with the kingdom of heaven has drawn near and is within you. Jesus does say “Repent for the kingdom of Heaven has drawn near… but it was his first sermon and they really improve from there. He gets to know his context, he tells stories about much mended nets and a woman needing bread dough, he feeds people and heals people, all so they can not only hear about the Kingdom of God but also so they can taste it and feel it and enact it. He sees Peter James and John fishing, and in the midst of the conversation he connects with their narratives and invites them to fish for people; to invite people into a movement. He meets people where they are, whether they are in need of healing, like Mary Magdalene, or in need of liberation from the work of collecting Roman taxes, like Matthew.

Jesus meets people where they are and begins to help them imagine a future that they cannot see but feel compelled to not just join, but to be all in. They leave everything behind to be a part of Jesus’ work.  There are a few special stories of Jesus inviting people and including people, he invites a few by name but suddenly a few verses later there are 12. It is as though the Gospel writers were going along and thought, oh we have to write everyone down but there is no story attached to each name and there are only 12. Where do they come from? Who invited them? The community grows and it’s not just Jesus doing the inviting, connecting and including. In the Gospel of John, Simon Peter is invited down by the shore by his brother, Andrew.

Andrew’s invitation could have changed everything. But what if he hadn’t? What if he made a different choice or even choices?  First, he could have stayed where it was comfortable, hanging with John the Baptist. Change is hard; change in jobs, change in churches, change in community organizations but change does not stop Andrew. John the Baptist points Andrew to Jesus and he is not only interested, he is so interested, he gets his brother. That’s where he could have made yet another choice, he could have said, “I want this whole Jesus movement to myself. I had to share everything, even a bedroom with this guy my whole life. I’m not sharing this too.” But he doesn’t keep it to himself, he chooses inclusion. Now he could have made the choice a lot of us make, which is not intentionally excluding Simon Peter, but assuming if he’s interested he will find out on his own. Andrew doesn’t say, “I’m sure he’s busy enough with his family or I feel weird inviting him, like some of us might when we think about including or inviting folks to church or community or gatherings. He just does it. He includes his brother. And his brother says, “Yes.” When Andrew invites his brother, Simon, it is born out of love and he must have had some sense that Simon Peter had something to bring to this community as well, not just something he needs, but something that is going to excite him and connect his gifts. Andrew invites his brother Simon, and despite all of his epic failures and mistakes… Peter becomes the rock of the church. Imagine if he had not, imagine if he had made a different choice. This moment matters. It changes everything; and it is born out of relationship, vulnerably and whole hearted risk-taking.

Walter Brueggemann defines evangelism as an “invitation to reimagine our lives.”1 Valuing the ancient in the modern context, he suggests the church as the place for “alternative conversation” which invites life-giving transformation 2. Brueggemann identifies three archetypal narratives as “the promise to the ancestors, the liberation of slaves, and the gift of the land to displaced peasants.”3  Scripture is a collection of stories or “reflections on experiences of salvation, of God’s liberating love,” of mutuality experienced in such a radical way that it changes people’s lives and transforms our world 4. Jesus invites people into the stories of their past and in community they practice abundance. People change in this experience, but it is not because he reminds them they are so sinful or because they are afraid of eternal damnation. People change around Jesus because they are more whole heartedly themselves, more bold in confronting the systems of brokenness and more compassionate in bringing healing to the people around them. They change because they are beloved and they change because they don’t just talk about abundance, they practice it, make mistakes and then try again. People change and communities change but Jesus does not work out of a system of domination or compliance or control. Transformation is rooted in worth and a willingness to see as God sees and an openness to love as God loves. That’s why Andrew invites his brother Simon Peter, that’s why Mary Magdalene travels with Jesus, that’s why Matthew doesn’t collect another tax, that’s why Martha invites Jesus into her home, that’s why Zacchaeus gives half of his wealth away and repatriates what he took with interest and that’s why fishermen leave their nets and boats to fish for something bigger. And that’s why invitations and inclusion matter, because people are liberated to be more fully themselves; beautifully and wonderfully made in the image of God. That’s the sacred work of evangelism.

I believe this whole heartedly. That’s at the heart of creating this community, making a safe and sacred place, a living sanctuary that values everyday relationships all the time. I want us to be a hub of relationship, the connective tissue in the community that brings hope and healing. It’s a great theory, but practice is hard. Because there is this reality of starting something new, both a coffee shop and a church, which is that you may not exist if folks don’t come. There is pressure to grow and grow fast. I attended countless trainings about new church starts and church growth. It’s not hard; it is real discipline. They have all these strategies like placing 30 pennies in your right pocket and moving one to your left pocket every time you talk with someone new, share your card, and invite them. Handing out flyers and being at events. I asked all the church people I knew if they could connect me with a person they knew that didn’t attend a church. I cold called people and asked them to have coffee and told them about what we were doing to create a new church community. I handed out flyers in the Farmers Market knowing that 10% would come in and 3% may give worship a try and 1% may stay… and if you are trying to connect with people and grow a community - that’s a lot of flyers and rejection! And for me it was a lot of time saying, “I’m inviting you and I’m not like those other people who invited you before.”

It was a lot of work and I can tell you that there were times when it didn’t even seem to be working, at least not fast enough for the goals I had set with the conference. In 2015, when we graduated from FUMC and became independent, thanks to luck and discipline, we had a good size community gathering in the evening. It had taken a long time but people were connected and shared stories of how much it meant to them to find this place. My hope that we would make a space that mattered was beginning to make a difference. But we still needed to grow into full sustainability. We needed to grow, whether we wanted to or not (plus the Bishop was cutting new church starts worshiping fewer than 120 folks a week, which was a great motivator, even if it was out of fear and not out of love). That year, we were gaining a second pastor, so I just doubled our goals. Right? Two pastors, twice the outreach, and bam, mission accomplished, I could get a banner we would be at 120 in no time! And that year we didn’t get close. Not even. We started a second service and still had about the same average weekly attendance. I was afraid of failing. I was afraid of closing. I was afraid and I was annoyed. I remember, someone from City Lights Church, converting someone over a cup of coffee, at one of our tables, to come to their church. It was everything I remembered and I wanted to shout, “NOOOO! Don’t do it. Oh please just come here.” Why is the threat of hell so compelling, why is invitation without it so hard, why do we only have carrots and no sticks and why don’t people want them?

People asked if I thought our campus ministry would grow faster if it was um... less... um gay? If we were more normal as a church and less direct about justice maybe we would grow faster or at least maybe not host Vagina Monologues. It’s true that most of the new church starts that exist beyond the startup phase, at least that I knew of, were not progressive. They did not start in a neighborhood with research data that says, “Opposed to organized religion.” I was overwhelmed with the goals at hand and I had forgotten WHY reaching people mattered in the first place. I had to stop spinning away from the whole heart of the work. This wasn’t about growth for growth’s sake or growth to please a Bishop or growth to prove a point to people who didn’t think it was possible; it was about including people, building relationships that mattered, stringing ties to one another so we could treat one another as sacred and beloved. I forgot the why. I panicked and forgot that we were here to build relationships, all kinds of them. Community partners, folks at the coffee bar, people who want a good book, milk vendors, downtown neighbors…even or perhaps especially the ones who are never going to come to church. Vendors at the Farmer’s Market, College Students and a hundred other identities…oh and folks who come to church. That’s the difference. We are rooted with a strategically different shape to remind us when we forget, it’s not just about us, it’s not just about the church - it’s about community. Relationships are slow, they require time and care and they are not transactional…like I will spend time with you if you can commit to attending worship twice a month for the next 10 years.

One of my favorite professors invited me into this language of emancipation. Marjorie Procter-Smith pushes beyond non-sexist and inclusive models of God-Language in worship, to emancipatory language, which makes women visible.  She reminds us all that language is important, that just using non-gendered language for God is not liberating enough, we still see Santa Clause when we hear the word God and that just doesn’t go far enough. It doesn’t help anyone see and value women as sacred, particularly women.  Her work is similar to James Cone when he said, “God is Black” and to the Liberation Theologians who call us to look at the brown faces caged by our boarder as divine. For Procter-Smith, emancipatory language challenges and transforms through “reinterpretation of terms of derision” and remembering as well as through new “collective identity” and imagining 5.   Emancipatory language, liturgy, and preaching assume “that God is engaged in women’s struggles for emancipation, even to the point of identifying with those who struggle.”6 God is in the vulnerable.

I believe our work in Evangelism is emancipatory, and it is liberating. Relationships weave us into one another and our faith invites us to lay our stories up against the stories of those long past who found abundance in a world of scarcity, connection in a world of control and worth in a world that wants to place a value with each paycheck, test score or dress size. That’s why people told their brothers or invited their friends to join the journey with Jesus. It wasn’t because he had skinny jeans or a smoke machine in worship, it was because people mattered and he built relationships that empowered people, inspired people and liberated people. It mattered so much, they would risk everything in love to share that gift with someone else.

Our very existence runs counter to these toxic narratives of the world and to the ways the church has been conformed by the world in spiritual bankrupt practices of evangelism. We have a mission.  Our mission is the transformation of the world. This is bigger than our coffee bar, bigger than our church, it is bigger than the Methodist Church and it is bigger than our country.  And we have a means to this work which is discipleship, not cheap evangelism. That is a big mission, which means we need to invite everyone we know, and their brother and their cousin and probably even their cat. It means we are responsible for this work, sent out just like the early disciples to bring healing, teaching and feasting that show the world a different way, inviting everyone to the table of abundance, sharing the stories and really tasting and seeing abundance. Transformation of the world is a tall order especially when it relies on folks like Peter and Matthew and you and me. We make mistakes and fail in epic ways. We get small and petty about things, we get focused on numbers or shortcomings. We get nervous about sharing our stories and we get caught up in liking things small and manageable or wanting to count things that don’t really matter. That’s not what this is all about. We are called to show up, to weave a web of relationships and to care deeply. May we have the courage to see and to celebrate the worth and value of others. May we have the courage to listen, and may we have the courage to build and strengthen the relationships that make us all better!

May it be so!
Amen.

Questions for Reflection:
Do you have experiences with the word evangelism or the practice of evangelism?

What does it mean to you to increase people and invite people? Who might be seeking what you know?

What person or organization are you committed to growing a relationship with?



  1. Walter Bruggermann, Biblical Perspectives on Evangelism: Living in a Three-Storied Universe, (Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press, 1993), 10.
  2. Ibid, 47.
  3. Ibid, 10.
  4. Sallie McFague, Abundant Life: Rethinking Theology and Economy for a Planet in Peril, (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2001), 61.
  5. Marjorie Procter-Smith.  In Her Own Rite: Constructing Feminist Liturgical Tradition.  (Akron, Ohio: Order of Saint Luke, 2003, originally 1990.), 55.
  6. Ibid, 56.